flawless_precision: (pic#10174189)
Captain Phasma ([personal profile] flawless_precision) wrote in [community profile] driftfleet2016-08-08 12:36 am

Anonymous Text// Action: Wonderduck

Network

[In the spirit of keeping a low profile and capitalizing on the fact that most of the people of her world haven't seen her face, Phasma decides to break the network silence with an anonymous text post in order to attempt to gather intel.]

To what extent would you sacrifice securities for freedom?

Action

[Ever since her visit to the green planet before their departure, and her conversation with General Hux, she's been playing mute aboard her ship; observing, listening, using a minimalist pantomime where absolutely necessary. She doesn't trust her crew, she doesn't trust the ship, and she doesn't trust Atroma. The one person she does trust she's agreed not to contact unless in a guaranteed secure location, which isn't anywhere on the Fleet itself.]

[She keeps to herself, but if you're lucky you might catch her making a meal to take to her quarters (or the hanger, or wherever there is a quite, lonley spot). If she does happen to appear where there are people gathered, it's on the fringe, where she can quietly observe the conversation without feeling obligated to add to it.]
wolfehawke: (Anders no)

anonymous text

[personal profile] wolfehawke 2016-08-17 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
No, there should still be laws to protect everyone, but I do mean everyone, not just one group over another as seems to be the way in many places. Just because a group of people have innate abilities that could be construed as dangerous does not mean that the rule of law should protect only the people without. If they act in a way that harms anyone, they should be punished, but so too should it go for those of the group without abilities.

It may not be exactly what you asked, but it is intrinsically tied.